A Constructive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
\(\Phi^4_3\) on the torus I:
the FBSDE in force coordinates and renormalisation
Massimiliano Gubinelli | University of Oxford
Joint work with Sarah-Jean Meyer, with the use of AI
SISSA lectures, Lecture 6 — notes: Lecture 6,
§§10–12
Lecture 4. Interacting field at resolution \(t\) = solution of the FBSDE
In the forecast coordinate \(\psi_t =\mathbb{E}_t \Phi_T\) the forward equation has no drift and the trees are integrated exactly; the backward half is the force equation.
Lectures 6–7. Construct \(\Phi^4_3\) on \(\mathbb{T}^3\) with this FBSDE:
deterministic renormalisation: an explicit approximate force \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}_q\) and its defect (today);
a priori estimates for the exact FBSDE in the coordinates of \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}_q\), uniform in the lattice (Lecture 7);
removing the cutoffs and identifying the limit (Lecture 7).
Notes: Lectures 6–7 and the Supplement; Bailleul–Chevyrev–G. (in prep.)
For every coupling \(\lambda > 0\), every reference mass \(q_0 > 0\) and every finite part \(r\) of the counterterm, on a fixed torus, with no smallness, and an explicit counterterm with arbitrary finite part:
the whole lattice sequence converges to a measure \(\nu\), an explicit density over an explicit SDE;
the forecasts converge to the solution of an FBSDE from \(Y_{q_0} = 0\), driven by the limit of the lattice innovations, and \(\psi_q = m_q (\Phi_q)\);
uniqueness in law for its scalar form, a variational formula with no infinite constant, quartic tails, integration by parts.
Not proved: the vector FBSDE alone, strong solutions, OS axioms in full, infinite volume.
Guiding principle. Do not estimate \(\Phi\) and \(F\). Estimate the error of an explicit approximate forecast.
The results of Lectures 6–7 are new: joint work with S.-J. Meyer + AI.
The problem and the exact FBSDE
Lecture 6
\(\Lambda_N = (N^{- 1} \mathbb{Z}/\mathbb{Z})^3\), \(\int f = N^{- 3} \sum_x f (x)\), \(\Delta = \Delta_N\) nearest neighbour. Resolution parameter \(q = q_0 + t^2 \in [q_0, \infty)\):
In Lecture 3 notation (\(T = \infty\), and \(\dot{Q} = \partial_q Q_q\)):
Free resolvents (uniform in \(N\))
\(C_q \geqslant 0\) as a kernel, \(C_q \mathbb{1} = q^{- 1} \mathbb{1}\), \(\|C_q \|_{p \to p} = q^{- 1}\),
The bubble \(a_2 (q)\) is the coincident-point variance of the shell at resolution \(q\).
So \(D^2 U (y) = \lambda y^2\): the coupling is the curvature, the same \(\lambda\) as in Lecture 4.
The Wick ordering is now part of \(\mu_N\).
Reference mass \(q_0 > 0\) (constants \(\in \ker \Delta\) on the torus; \(r\) may be negative). Only \(q_0 + \mu_N\) matters: fix \(q_0\), vary \(r\).
Main result, informal. Let
Then (a) \(\nu_N \to \nu\) in \(H^{- s}\), \(s > \frac{1}{2}\), along the whole sequence; (b) the forecasts converge in law to a solution of a limiting FBSDE; (c) \(\nu\) has a variational formula, an integration by parts formula and quartic tails.
These come from bounds on the error \(Z\) of an approximate forecast, uniform in \(N\): UV stability.
By Lecture 4, in the profile \(S_q = C_q\), \(\mathcal{R}_q = q - q_0\); at fixed \(N\) everything is a theorem. The Polchinski process solves
and \(\Phi_q \to \Phi_{\infty} \sim \nu_N\).
a noisy observation of its endpoint, \(\Phi_q = (q - q_0) C_q \Phi_{\infty} + C_q B_{q - q_0}\), with \(B\) independent of \(\Phi_{\infty}\);
forecast
covariance \(\text{Cov}_q > 0\);
\(W\) is the innovation: \(\mathrm{d} \psi_q = \text{Cov}_q \hspace{0.17em} \mathrm{d} W_q\);
noise: \(\omega_q = K_q \Phi_q - (q - q_0) \psi_q =\mathbb{E}_q B_{q - q_0}\), sub-Gaussian whatever the interaction (L5).
One site, \(\nu \propto \mathrm{e}^{- \lambda \varphi^4 / 12} \mu^{1 / q_0}\), \(\lambda = 6\), \(q_0 = 1\). Left: one path of the observation \(\Phi_q\) and of the forecast \(\psi_q\), both converging to the hidden \(\Phi_{\infty}\). Right, over 200 paths: the forecast error \(\sim q^{- 1 / 2}\), the force term \(\psi_q - \Phi_q = C_q F_q \sim q^{- 1}\), and the error \(Z_q\) of the approximate forecast from \(\bar{\mathcal{F}} = \frac{\lambda}{3} y^3\), below the bound \(2 C_{\ast} (\lambda / 3)^{1 / 2} q^{- 3 / 2}\) of Theorem 10.12 (see "Integrating the cube" below).
Since \(\Phi_q \mapsto \psi_q\) is invertible, define \(\mathcal{F}_q\) by
and \(H^{\text{ex}}_q (y) = (K_q + D\mathcal{F}_q (y))^{- 1}\). It is the \(\mathcal{F}\) of Lecture 4 (\(x = \psi + S\mathcal{F} (\psi)\)), and \(F_q = -\mathcal{F}_q (\psi_q)\).
The force equation with a mass regulator
Itô on \(\Phi = \psi + C\mathcal{F} (\psi)\). Its integrated form is Wetterich's equation, which we do not need. An identity about the unknown \(\nu_N\), not a construction.
Strategy: an approximate force \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}\) gives approximate forecast coordinates; the error should be driven by the failure of \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}\) to solve this equation.
\(\bar{\mathcal{F}}_q\) odd, \(D \bar{\mathcal{F}}_q\) symmetric, \(K_q + D \bar{\mathcal{F}}_q \geqslant \bar{c}_q I\), \(\bar{c}_q > 0\). Recall \(\psi_q =\mathbb{E}_q [\Phi_{\infty}]\), \(\text{Cov}_q =\operatorname{Var}_q (\Phi_{\infty})\),
Exact, at fixed \(N\)
Proof: Itô on the coordinate equation, with the Polchinski process and \(\mathrm{d} C_q = - C_q^2 \mathrm{d} q\): the martingale part gives \(H\), the drift gives \(HZ + b\).
\(Y\): forward and explicit once \(Z\) is known; coefficients \(b, H\) built from \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}\).
\(Z\): backward. The terminal condition \(qZ_q \to 0\) is proved at fixed \(N\) (Lecture 7), because \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}_q \to\) bare force.
The only source of \(Z\) is the drift \(b\), the force defect, transported by \(\exp \int H\).
UV stability
The explicit force \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}\) computes the forecast up to an error \(Z\) which is small uniformly in \(N\).
Needed: (i) a defect integrable against the backward propagator (renormalisation); (ii) global coercivity of \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}\) (large fields); (iii) a priori estimates (Lecture 7).
\(J\): large-field functional, \(E\): energy (both Lecture 7); \(b^{\text{b}}, b^{\text{l}}\): bounded- and large-field parts of the drift.
Programme: keep \(- \frac{\lambda}{3} \varphi^3\) unclipped, clip the higher orders (result: \(f\)), pay in the source of \(R = F - f\). Test it on one site: \(K_q = q\), \(S = 1 / q\).
So \(3 R / (\lambda x^3) \to 1\): the remainder cancels the cube (the dip: \(R\) changes sign, Wick term below, cube above). Field equation: \(qx = (q - q_0) m_q + \omega_q\), only linear confinement.
\(f^c = f_1 +\mathcal{C}f_2\), with \(f_1 = - \frac{\lambda}{3} (x^3 + 3 Sx)\), \(f_2\) the first tree, \(\kappa_q\) a smooth clip at \(|x| \sim r_q\), \(\mathcal{C}f_2 = \kappa_q \prime \cdot f_2 \circ \kappa_q\). For \(|x| \geqslant 2 r_q\), the Burgers defect is exactly
of order \((q / \lambda)^{1 / 2}\) at the edge of the clip: not integrable in \(q\).
The source and the dissipation cancel for the true \(R \sim \frac{\lambda}{3} x^3\): separate estimates give nothing.
Tails independent of \(R\): on one site from the posterior moment, but not uniform on the lattice (negative bare mass).
More orders do not help: the tree series has radius \(\frac{2}{3} r_q\).
Solve the transport part of the flow exactly:
\(y_q (\Phi_q) = Y_q\): this is the forecast coordinate. \(F_q - f_q = K_q Z_q\), and \(Z\) is the posterior mean minus the mode.
The defect is \(qb_q (y)\): bounded for all fields. The trees are in \(x \mapsto y\); the cube does not flow in \(y\), so only loops are clipped.
The cube is coercive in \(y\): \(qy + \frac{\lambda}{3} y^3 = q \Phi_q\).
Renormalisation: why two of them
Lecture 6
We seek an explicit force with a small defect, not the full solution of the nonlinear flow.
At infinite resolution: \(\mathcal{F}_{\infty} = U\prime + \mu_N y\), with \(U\prime (y) = \frac{\lambda}{3} y^3\).
Insert the bare cube into the response and the vertex: a one-loop seed.
Feed each approximation back into the equation: two correction steps.
Estimate the remaining defect in the backward equation for \(Z\).
First separate the linear flow: it produces the divergent mass counterterm and cannot be treated as a small nonlinear error.
Insert \(U\prime\) into the loop, with
Its linear Taylor coefficient is
In three dimensions \(a_2 (q)\) has continuum size \(q^{- 1 / 2}\): its integral to infinity diverges. At fixed lattice cutoff it is finite, but grows with \(N\).
This is the tadpole. Further insertions also produce the logarithmic sunset. Keep the linear flow in a running mass; iterate only the nonlinear remainder.
For a smooth odd force \(f\), and a translation-invariant operator \(L = \langle L \rangle I + L^{\circ}\) (constant mode plus centred part):
\(\Pi f\) starts at cubic order; \(\Pi' f = \Pi f + (\operatorname{Df}(0))^{\circ} y\) removes only the scalar part of the linear jet.
The divergences (tadpole, sunset) are constant modes. The centred part of the linear flow is integrable at infinity.
\(\ell\) and the centred kernel \(\Theta\): integrate from \(\infty\), by the same finite iteration. Scalar mass \(\mu\): solve exactly, fixed at an auxiliary large scale \(q_{\ast}\) (with \(g_{q_{\ast}}\) small).
Free field at resolution \(q\): free field \(X_q\), \(\text{Var} X_q (x) \lesssim q^{1 / 2}\), typical size \(q^{1 / 4} = g_q^{1 / 2} r_q \ll r_q\).
Rooted norm of a vertex \(T (x_1, \ldots, x_k)\) and field ball:
Natural size of the \(k\)-leg vertex of the loop corrections:
Root one leg of a closed loop and follow the loop: two of its propagators are estimated in \(L^2\) (this gives the bubble \(a_2 (q)\)), all the others in operator norm (each \(q^{- 1}\)).
Loop estimate
A closed loop with \(p\) vertices:
(two propagators in \(L^2\), the others in operator norm). After the \(q\) integration a one-loop term is of size \(g_q qr_q^{2 - k}\); every further loop gains a factor \(g_q\).
Project the bare loop before integrating:
Use \(\partial_q G_q = - G_q^2\) and \(\partial_q C_q = - C_q^2\). With zero boundary value at infinity:
The leading term is the bubble:
Four-leg size: \(\textsf{S}_4 (\ell^{[1]}_q) \lesssim \lambda^2 q^{- 1 / 2} = \lambda g_q\). This is the seed \(\ell^{[1]}\): the superscript counts loops.
The seed as one-loop graphs: lines \(C_q\), a vertex \(\lambda y^2\) with its two external fields at each corner. The \(j\)-th ring has \(2 j\) legs and coefficient \((- 1)^{j + 1} / (2 j)\); \(D\) marks one leg, giving the force. The series sums to a logarithm, with radius of convergence \(r_q\). The quartic ring is the bubble.
For \(\mathcal{F}= U\prime + My + \ell\), the loop map
Three equations of different nature:
Fix a trial scalar path \(\mu\) (determined at the end as a fixed point, "Closing the mass path"). Level masses \(M^{[j]} = \mu I + \Theta^{[j]}\), sources \(\mathfrak{S}^{[j]} = D\mathcal{T} [M^{[j]}, \ell^{[j]}] (0)\), zero-field response \(R^{[j]}_{0, q} = (K_q + M^{[j]}_q)^{- 1}\):
With \(\ell^{[0]} = 0\), \(M^{[0]} = 0\), the case \(j = 0\) is the seed step without mass, \(\partial_q \ell^{[1]} = \Pi \mathcal{T} [0, 0]\), and \(\Theta^{[1]} = 0\) (the tadpole is local). Output: \((\ell^{[3]}, \Theta^{[3]}) [\mu]\).
A centred kernel \(\Theta (z) = \Theta (0, z)\) is measured by its first moment \(v_1 (\Theta) = \int d (0, z) | \Theta (z) | \mathrm{d} z\), \(d\) the torus distance. For an even kernel, \(\Theta \mathbb{1} = 0\) means that the diagonal cancels the off-diagonal mass. With \((\sigma_z f) (x) = f (x + z)\), \(\delta_z^2 = \sigma_z + \sigma_{- z} - 2 I\),
The absolute row norm discards the cancellation. For a lattice step \(h\) in direction \(e\), take
The row norm diverges as \(h \to 0\); the first moment stays bounded.
Estimate the signed product \(C_q \Theta\) first. The quantity needed by the loop is the kernel after resolvent smoothing, not the absolute mass of \(\Theta\) itself.
The resolvent smooths on length scale \(q^{- 1 / 2}\):
Scale check: integrate the heat-kernel translation bound \(Cd (0, z) t^{- 1 / 2}\) against \(\mathrm{e}^{-\operatorname{qt}} \mathrm{d} t\).
The iteration (next slides) supplies exactly the compensating moment:
A bound by \(d (0, z)^2\) loses a logarithm; one distance power, with \(q^{- 1 / 2}\), suffices (Lemma 19.3 of the Supplement).
The field-dependent response also receives this cancellation. With \(V = \lambda y^2\) and \(G = (K_q + V)^{- 1}\),
The bounded Neumann series for the full \(R\) then gives
Holding the nonlinear correction fixed, \(\delta R = - R \delta M \hat{R}\) (\(\hat{R}\) the response at mass \(M - \delta M\)) has row norm \(\lesssim \rho_q / q\) and row \(L^2\) norm \(\sup_x \| \delta R (x, \cdot)\|_{L^2}\) \(\lesssim \rho_q \sqrt{a_2 (q)}\).
A marked propagator gains the relative factor \(\rho_q\): for \(\Theta^{[2]}\) in the second correction, \(\rho_q \lesssim g_q^2\); for two scalar paths, see "Mass differences" below.
Separate the source at level \(j\) into tadpole and correction vertex:
Write \(E_q \mathbb{1} = e_q \mathbb{1}\). The constant mode contains the whole local contribution:
The tadpole cancels; so does any term \(c_q I\). Off-diagonal entries stay unchanged. Since \(d (0, 0) = 0\),
Centring removes the local obstruction. The remaining spatial estimate must come from the first moment of the nonlinear vertex.
Four-leg vertex \(T^{[j]}_q\) of \(\ell^{[j]}\), proved below level by level (\(\Theta^{[2]}\) needs only the bubble \(T^{[1]}\), \(\Theta^{[3]}\) only \(T^{[2]}\), at \(M^{[1]} = \mu I\)):
Keep the distance between the uncontracted legs of \(T^{[j]}_q\); since \(\sup_{u, v} | (R^{[j]}_{0, q})^2 (u, v) | \lesssim q^{- 1 / 2}\),
Integrate with zero boundary value at infinity:
Uniformly in \(N\): \(\eta_q (\Theta^{[2]}) \lesssim g_q^2\), and one more \(g\) for the difference, \(\eta_q (\Theta^{[3]} - \Theta^{[2]}) \lesssim g_q^3\), with \(\eta_q (\Theta) = q^{- 1 / 2} v_1 (\Theta)\).
Set \(R^{[j]} = (K + M^{[j]} +\operatorname{DU}\prime + D \ell^{[j]})^{- 1}\) and \(\delta^{[2]} = \ell^{[2]} - \ell^{[1]}\). Subtract the bare loop from the loop containing the seed:
Two changes: the propagators and the vertex.
The insertion \((\mu + D \ell^{[1]}) / q\) is \(O (g_q)\). One extra loop gives
All factors inside the integral are evaluated at scale \(s\).
Put \(\delta^{[3]} = \ell^{[3]} - \ell^{[2]}\). Subtract the first two Picard equations:
The marked insertion is now the first correction itself, nonlinear and centred:
where \(\Theta^{[2]}\) costs \(\eta_q (\Theta^{[2]}) \lesssim g_q^2\) (above).
Four-leg sizes: seed \(\lambda g_q\), first correction \(\lambda g_q^2\), second correction \(\lambda g_q^3\).
For squared propagators use \(A^2 - B^2 = A (A - B) + (A - B) B\); no commutativity is assumed.
At zero field, set \(W_q (T) = s (T) + \sqrt{q} v_1 (T)\). Mark two external legs and follow their distance around the loop.
A displacement inside a vertex is controlled by that vertex's first moment.
A displacement along a propagator is controlled by its weighted \(L^1\) or \(L^2\) bound. The triangle inequality distributes the external distance over these pieces.
For \(p\) vertices and \(p\) propagators:
The weight \(\sqrt{q}\) makes a distance of order \(q^{- 1 / 2}\) dimensionless: the weighted loop has the same scale powers as the unweighted loop.
Keep within-vertex moments: smoothing the propagators cannot supply spatial localisation for an arbitrary nonlocal vertex.
A loop difference with relative size \(\varepsilon_s\) has a marked vertex or propagator. With \(\delta \mathcal{T}_s =\mathcal{T}_s [M, \ell] -\mathcal{T}_s [M, \hat{\ell}]\), the weighted comparison gives
For \(s \geqslant q\), \(\sqrt{q} \leqslant \sqrt{s}\):
First correction: \(\varepsilon_s \lesssim g_s\). Second correction: \(\varepsilon_s \lesssim g_s^2\).
\(\Pi\) subtracts only a linear force, so it leaves all \(k \geqslant 4\) vertices unchanged. The field supremum also propagates, since \(\mathcal{B}_q \subseteq \mathcal{B}_s\).
Write \(T^{[j]}_q = \mathrm{D}^3 \ell^{[j]}_q (0)\). The seed is the bubble:
For the increments, integrate the weighted loop bounds:
For \(j = 1, 2, 3\), \(s (T^{[j]}_q) + \sqrt{q} v_1 (T^{[j]}_q) \lesssim \lambda^2 q^{- 1 / 2} (1 + g_q + g_q^2) \lesssim \lambda^2 q^{- 1 / 2}\).
The \(10 \to 8 \to 6\) leg budget supplies the higher vertices needed by both comparisons. Thus \(v_1 (T^{[j]}_q) \lesssim \lambda^2 q^{- 1}\).
Impose the scalar part of the linear flow for the final approximation \(M = M^{[3]} = \mu I + \Theta^{[3]}\), with \(R^{[3]}_{0, q} = (K_q + M_q)^{- 1}\):
with \(\mu_{q_{\ast}} = b_{\ast}\), \(|b_{\ast} | \leqslant B_0 \lambda q_{\ast}^{1 / 2}\), at an auxiliary scale \(q_{\ast}\). The centred part of \(\mathfrak{S}^{[3]}\) is not imposed. Bare mass \(\mu_N = \text{lim}_{q \to \infty} \mu_q\): an output of the flow. \(\beta\) depends on the whole path \(\mu\) through \(\ell^{[3]} [\mu]\): a fixed point ("Closing the mass path").
The bounded-field approximation:
The approximations use the preceding level, \(\partial_q \ell^{[3]} = \Pi \mathcal{T} [M^{[2]}, \ell^{[2]}]\), \(\partial_q \Theta^{[3]} = (\mathfrak{S}^{[2]})^{\circ}\). Hence
nonlinear part and a centred linear part \(\mathcal{E}^c_q y\); the scalar part vanishes by the mass equation.
One loop with \(\delta^{[3]}\) and \(\Theta^{[3]} - \Theta^{[2]}\) inserted, without a scale integration:
The constant and scalar linear jets of the defect vanish, so on the field ball
Both terms have the same size; \(s / q\) is the backward transport. The cubic source:
| corrections | \(\textsf{S}_4 (\mathcal{D}_s)\) | backward source integral |
| 0: seed | \(\lambda^3 s^{- 2}\) | \(\lambda^{3 / 2} q^{- 1} \int_q^{\infty} s^{- 1 / 2} \mathrm{d} s = \infty\) |
| 1 | \(\lambda^4 s^{- 5 / 2}\) | \(\lambda^{5 / 2} q^{- 1} \int_q^{\infty} s^{- 1} \mathrm{d} s = \infty\) |
| 2 | \(\lambda^5 s^{- 3}\) | \(\lambda^{7 / 2} q^{- 1} \int_q^{\infty} s^{- 3 / 2} \mathrm{d} s = 2 \lambda^{7 / 2} q^{- 3 / 2}\) |
One correction is logarithmically borderline. Two corrections beyond the seed suffice for the bounded-field source estimate.
Each step costs two field derivatives: keep the iteration finite. Full estimates: Lecture 7.
Each step inserts the previous correction into the loop: one more loop, one more \(g_q\). Two steps give a defect of order \(g_q^3\).
Given a trial scalar path \(\mu\), compute the two steps of the iteration, corrections and centred kernels, then
The mass is the fixed point \(\mu =\mathcal{A} [\mu]\): a scalar function of \(q\), not an operator-valued path. It is the only fixed point we solve; the centred kernels are explicit outputs of two Picard steps.
This is an equation for the whole path: the corrections and centred kernels at \(q\) depend on \(\mu\) at later scales.
For \(q_{\ast}\) large, uniformly in \(N\):
a unique scalar path in the ball \(\| \mu \|_{\ast} \leqslant R\) (norm on the next slide), so \(| \mu_q | \lesssim \lambda q^{1 / 2}\);
centred kernels: \(v_1 (\Theta^{[j]}_q) \lesssim \lambda^2 q^{- 1 / 2}\);
increments: \(\mathcal{N}_{k, q} (\ell^{[j]} - \ell^{[j - 1]}) \lesssim g_q^j qr_q^{2 - k}\), \(j = 1, 2, 3\), \(4 \leqslant k \leqslant 12 - 2 j\), where
defect: \(\textsf{S}_4 (\mathcal{D}^o_q) \lesssim \lambda^5 q^{- 3}\), \(\|\mathcal{E}^c_q \|_{\text{row}} \lesssim g_q^4\).
Explicit counterterm. \(\mu_N = r - \lambda \text{Tr} C + \frac{2}{3} \lambda^2 \int C^3\) is reached by a unique boundary value \(b_{\ast, N}\), and \(b_{\ast, N}\) converges as \(N \to \infty\). The measure does not depend on \(q_{\ast}\).
Inner recursion: for each trial scalar path \(\mu\), start from the seed and compute exactly two steps.
Outer contraction: start at \(\mu^{(0)}_q = b_{\ast}\); iterate \(\mu^{(n + 1)} =\mathcal{A} [\mu^{(n)}]\), in the norm \(\| \mu \|_{\ast} = \sup_{q \geqslant q_{\ast}} | \mu_q | / (\lambda \sqrt{q})\):
Every outer step recomputes the same two-level force. Its depth stays \(2\), so no additional field derivatives are consumed. At the fixed point the scalar linear flow is exact; the defect, nonlinear and centred linear, remains.
Compare two scalar paths with the same \(b_{\ast}\), \(d = \| \mu - \hat{\mu} \|_{\ast}\); \(\delta\) denotes output differences, \(\delta M^{[j]} = \delta \mu I + \delta \Theta^{[j]}\).
The relative scalar and centred insertions obey
the latter by integrating the differences of the centred sources from infinity. Loop comparisons through the two levels give \(\mathcal{N}_{k, q} (\delta \ell^{[j]}) \lesssim g_q^2 qr_q^{2 - k} d\), \(j = 2, 3\), \(4 \leqslant k \leqslant 12 - 2 j\) (the seed does not depend on \(\mu\)).
The resulting source differences are
Scalar update: the common boundary value \(b_{\ast}\) cancels. With \(x = q / q_{\ast} \geqslant 1\),
The centred kernels are not part of the unknown: their variation is already contained in \(\delta \beta\).
Contraction constant \(Cg_{q_{\ast}}\). Fix an invariant ball, then choose \(q_{\ast}\) so that \(Cg_{q_{\ast}} < 1 / 2\), uniformly in \(N\).
A loop needs \(k + 2\) legs to control a \(k\)-leg vertex. Every evaluation of \(\mathcal{A}\) uses the same budget:
A \(k\)-leg force vertex has \(k - 1\) field derivatives. The mass source uses only the four-leg vertex of \(\ell^{[3]}\), the centred sources those of \(\ell^{[1]}\), \(\ell^{[2]}\).
A path difference inserts \(\delta M^{[j]}\) in a resolvent. It is field-independent: \(D_y \delta M^{[j]} = 0\). The comparison uses the same field-derivative ranges as the construction.
\(\mathcal{A}\) returns a scalar path. At the next outer step, restart from the original seed and perform the same two steps. We do not use the previous \(\ell^{[3]}\) as a new seed.
The outer iteration contracts in one fixed space of scalar paths. The finite Lipschitz estimates transfer convergence to the corrections; their derivative budget does not shrink with the outer index.
The two divergent self-energies of Appendix A.2 of Lecture 5:
Tadpole: \(- \lambda \int_{q_{\ast}}^{\infty} \text{Tr} R_{0, q}^2 \hspace{0.17em} \mathrm{d} q \approx - \lambda \text{Tr} C \sim - \lambda N\). Wick ordering: \(\frac{\lambda}{12} \varphi^4 - \frac{1}{2} \lambda c \varphi^2 = \frac{\lambda}{12} H_4 (\varphi ; c) +\)const.
Sunset: contracting the bubble in \(D^3 \ell^{[3]} (0)\) with \(R_0^2\) and integrating gives the two-loop self-energy,
Power counting: nothing else. In the flow: the integrals from \(q = \infty\) of all vertices with \(k \geqslant 4\) legs converge; only the constant mode of the linear jet needs a boundary condition at a finite scale.
\(\mu_q\) at fixed \(q\) has a limit as \(N \to \infty\); \(\mu_N\) does not. Never interchange the two limits.
The cross is \(\partial_q K_q = 1\), as before; with the two lines through it, it gives \((R^{[3]}_{0, q})^2\). The bubble in \(D^3 \ell^{[3]} (0)\) produces the sunset.
The flow at large fields
Lecture 6
All bounds hold on \(\mathcal{B}_q\) only. The free field exceeds \(r_q\) with small, nonzero probability, and nothing a priori controls the interacting forecast. We need \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}_q\) defined and uniformly coercive for all fields.
Scalar model
Its power series has radius exactly \(r_q\) (singularities at \(\pm \mathrm{i} r_q\)). Half of the truncations destroy monotonicity. The exact function is harmless, \({| \ell^{[1]}_q}' | \leqslant \frac{9}{8} \lambda / q\).
Perturbative control for \(|y| \lesssim r_q\); outside, a non-perturbative replacement that keeps the structure the estimates use: coercivity, carried by the bare cube.
One site: \(qy + \frac{\lambda}{3} y^3 = q \Phi_q\), noise coefficient \(H_q (y) = (q + \lambda y^2)^{- 1} \leqslant q^{- 1} \wedge (\lambda y^2)^{- 1}\). Large fields are more elliptic and less noisy.
\(\tau\) smooth odd, \(\tau (u) = u\) on \([- 1, 1]\), constant outside \([- 2, 2]\), \(0 \leqslant \tau \prime \leqslant 1\);
The cubic and linear parts are not clipped, and \(D \kappa_q\) keeps the force a gradient. Globally: \(s (D^{j - 1} \tilde{\ell}_q) \leqslant Cg_q qr_q^{2 - j}\) (\(j = 2, 3, 4\)), \(s (D \partial_q \tilde{\ell}_q) \leqslant Cg_q\).
Global coercivity
For all \(y\): \(c (K_q + \lambda y^2) \leqslant H_q (y)^{- 1} \leqslant C (K_q + \lambda y^2)\),
Neumann series for \(H = (I + G (M + D \tilde{\ell}))^{- 1} G\), \(G = (K_q + \lambda y^2)^{- 1} \leqslant C_q\).
\(b = b^{\text{b}} + b^{\text{l}}\), \(b^{\text{b}} = - H \hspace{0.17em} D \kappa \hspace{0.17em} \mathcal{D}^{\text{o}} (\kappa y)\), \(t_q (y) = y \mathbb{1}_{|y| > r_q}\).
Proposition.
Sources of \(b^{\text{l}}\) (four groups): the mass term \(M' y - JM' \kappa y\) (\(J = D \kappa\), \(M' = \partial_q M\); linear part unclipped, flow computed at \(\kappa y\)); the motion of the clip; cubic vertex at \(y\) vs correction at \(\kappa y\); chain-rule terms with \(\kappa'', \kappa'''\). All vanish if \(\|y\|_{\infty} \leqslant r_q\).
The point
\(b^{\text{l}}\) is as large as the whole drift, but supported on large fields. It is controlled by how often the actual dynamics visits them: \(\int q^{- 3 / 2} \lambda \|t_q (Y_q)\|_6^6 \hspace{0.17em} \mathrm{d} q\) (Lecture 7).
With \(U' = \frac{\lambda}{3} y^3\), up to a small Lipschitz perturbation, the forecast solves the cubic elliptic equation driven by the field at resolution \(q\):
The expansion needs \(g_q\) small, so \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}_q\) is built for \(q \geqslant q_{\ast}\). Below \(q_{\ast}\) nothing needs constructing: freeze it,
Then \(K_q + D \bar{\mathcal{F}}_q = K_{q_{\ast}} + D \bar{\mathcal{F}}_{q_{\ast}}\): coercivity is automatic, \(H_q = H_{q_{\ast}}\), and \(y_q (x) = y_{q_{\ast}} (C_{q_{\ast}} K_q x)\).
The defect is explicit: \(\mathcal{D}_s (y) = - y + \frac{1}{2} \text{Ctr}_{H_{q_{\ast}}^2} D^2 \bar{\mathcal{F}}_{q_{\ast}} (y)\), with \(\|\mathcal{D}_s (y)\|_p \leqslant C \|y\|_p\).
So the system holds on \([q_0, \infty)\) with \(Y_{q_0} = 0\): the initial value is deterministic, with no large mass. \(q_{\ast}\) stays only in the proofs, where the expansion and the closure of the loop need \(g_q\) small.
At every lattice:
\(\mu_N\), \(M_q\) and a globally coercive \(\bar{\mathcal{F}}_q\), all deterministic;
the exact FBSDE for \((Y, Z)\);
a source whose bounded-field part is integrable (two steps), and whose large-field part is controlled by sixth powers of \(Y\) on large fields.
Next: estimates on \((Y, Z)\) uniform in \(N\).